Compare the nazi system of governance with that of the United States Research Paper

Compare the nazi system of governance with that of the United States - Research Paper Example Nazi’s system of governance is Fascist, Totalitarian state type, and United States is a republic federal system (executive in nature) (Avery p.133). The two systems of governance (Nazi and United States) have shared and differing characteristics and this research paper will be a comparison between the two systems of governance. Nazis Totalitarianism and Fascism was a system of governance where dictatorship is dominant, and societal resources are monopolized by the state by using tactics like technology, terror and propaganda. The governance within the state was based on hierarchies that were fully dominated by one political party having one single leader. The one party system does penetrate the entire country using provisional and regional organizations. The leader in this type of system or regime focuses in mobilizing and making use of political participation, groups and communities are lead by local or regional leaders who are charismatic in outlining and championing their l eader’s promises and praises (Mullender pp. 178). The system reflects an aspect of extreme Nationalism which aimed at bringing about uniformity of all the German speaking citizens into one single unitary nation. The economy in Nazis system of governance was based on socialism, a form of corporate type of togetherness. The basis of socialism is that no competition is created and nobody suffers as all the wealth, resources were shared publically together. The Nazism system is based on the use of paramilitary institutions, the institution is created and instituted in order to scare, discourage and subdue opposition parties and maintain party supremacy (Rittberger pp.35). Examples of such paramilitaries include: storm troopers, defense corps, and secret state police. The type of governance system is based on massive use of spies and propaganda, and the philosophy of Elitism is also applied in running the state and other institutions. Elitism involves a process where just few soci al groups or individuals are given the power and authority to lead or rule. In United States, a type of republic government is applied with features of a federal system. The federal system is a system of governance where the state as divided the government into three branches and functions. Each of the branch having its own powers or authorities, but all the branches are been provide with checks and balances that ensures a regulation of reign of superiority with the purpose of legislation, execution and judicial functions. In legislation branch is given the responsibility of making federal laws and consists of senate and house of representations. The executive is given is given the job of enforcing and executing laws of the government. The judicial branch is to apply and interpret laws that are presented to them. The country is a republic because the people have been vested authority democratically to elect and recall back their leaders (Shefter pp.48). The republic or federal syste m is based on popular sovereignty which states that the entire whole power of the government lies on the people. The government needs to address the rights and needs of the people. The power and authority is invested on laws and acts provided by the people of the country and they must be adhered to fully. The basis of checks and balances is helpful in federal system so that one of the three branches of government does not become powerful or misuse any power or authority accorded to them (Shefter

Introduction to people at work Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Introduction to people at work - Essay Example They also have people management skills and are very decisive in nature. Training in business management is just sharpening the rough edges. Most of what makes a sales and marketing person is inborn. It cannot actually be taught and, after an in-depth search of myself, I realize I possess the qualities required for one to be a marketer. For an employer to be able to create and maintain a healthy environment at the work place, one needs to understand what the employees want, and find out what motivates them. As a potential employee and having worked before, there are some factors that are important to me when it comes to seeking a job in the future. As a marketer, being in control of my work and having room to make my own decisions is top of my list. Huck, Kubler & Weibull (2003, p.67) agree that marketing is a dynamic field and the strategies change depending on the current market forces. With this in mind, working in an environment filled with mutual support from those that I work w ith, and with respect is very important. This is because success in the sales and marketing department in any organization translates to great wins for the whole organization. I would also want to work for an organization that supports my values, and that promotes the values that make me the individual that I am. Additionally, I enjoy working with people, a factor that reinforces my choice of career bearing in mind that a marketer is a people’s person (Riches, 2003, p56). Lastly, career progression is yet another factor that will influence my choice of employer (Tiernan, 2006, p.15-23). Journal Entries Entry 1 During the second week, and during the class activity where we were required to decide between three courses of action, I confirmed that I am an independent thinker. Additionally, I discovered that I am not swayed by group dynamics, and that I am also concerned about how I relate with my colleagues. In essence, my choice for that particular class activity was the third and last choice. Mullins (2010, p.53-56) has discussed the importance of working in groups, and about culture and norms in the work place. The author talks about how pressure influence individuals to act in a certain way. Despite the pitfalls that come with working as a group at the work place, I discovered team work also has its advantages. One such advantage is that, through group work, one can be able to share difficult and unpleasant tasks with others. Additionally, groups give one a sense of belonging, and are a source of companionship (James & Anthony 2011 pp.90-96). This idea of group dynamics inspired me to read more on theories that propagated my initial attitude. I discovered that there are a few theoretical frameworks that were supporting my decision to stay silent, and to refuse to join my workmates in cheating time in between shifts. According to QUT (2011 pp.06-16), ethical egoism is a theory that states that a person should act in a way that maximizes his or her self interest and that a person should only act based on the interests of others only when its suits that person’s own interests. This means that a person’s actions are driven by a need to promote one’s interests or well being. After going through the week’s topic, and as I try to work in a group, I have learned new ways of handling problems. Lindemann (2012) writes about utilitarianism. This theory states that, an action can only be thought